1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15

John Mark Byers' Leeza Show Interview

What follows is an unedited interview with John Mark Byers conducted by Leeza Gibbons for her show about the West Memphis case. For reasons unclear to us the show was pulled from the air at the last minute. Fortunately, we had the opportunity to view the entire Byers interview and have transcribed it here. Due to the fact that Byers answered these questions without benefit of his dentures some of the words are unintelligible and are indicated as such.



Leeza Gibbons: This is one of the most despicable crimes I have ever heard of. I mean, heartbreakingly sad, brutal. As you well know, the guests on this show did not want to appear with you. Do you feel the same way about them?

John Mark Byers: Yes, in a way I do because it’s gonna be a real one-sided story. There’s quite a few of them, and I’m the only one standing up for the victims. I am not the villain.

LG: Well there are those who feel (and I know this is not news to you) that those three teenage boys who have charged with this crime and who are incarcerated right now are innocent. That they were convicted with no material evidence and that you perhaps are the real killer.

JMB: Leeza, let’s talk about material evidence, that’s a very good subject. There was a lot of material evidence: there were hair fibers (sic), there were fibers, and hair that was found and matched on (sic) the homes of the three. There was blue candle wax found on the Boy Scout shirt that Michael Moore wore, and they found a broken [unintelligible] in Damien Echols’ trailer. I think it was by Anton Levey and it had a blue candle sitting there and dripping on the book. Those two candle waxes (sic) matched exactly.

LG: That is being disputed.

JMB: Well, that’s what was told into the police record, that I believe candle wax was there.

LG
: Why do you think three teenage boys would abduct these little children and torture them? For what reason? What would be the motivation for that kind of a crime?

JMB: The motivation was known a year before it happened. After the court case was over and the documents were released, there was a reporter by the name of Bartholomew Sullivan who writes for the Commercial Appeal. And of course he does like a reporter and starts digging through, and